Welcome to this week's topic -
In-Class Discussions & Speech on Campus and Beyond
 |
The beautiful
not-so-hurricane view Wed. night |
The third week of college turned into the third week of "not actually attending college but still having to manage college" - Thanks, Hurricane Dorian.
Well, this week turned out to be much different than the previous week. I thought I had my life together; I thought I was a perfectly organized and prepared individual. I thought wrong.
This week I have been extremely overwhelmed by all of the upcoming due dates for all of my classes that I was unable to attend. My professors gave me all of my assignments this week as if the hurricane never happened (which in Statesboro...it didn't), and I have been forced to learn the material on my own. Normally, I can manage multiple assignments at once, but I have been
extremely stressed this week. To top it off, I am sick. So between hundreds of tissues (literally) and way too many math problems, I am very, very overwhelmed.
However, I know the importance of mental health. I have been taking measures to ensure that I get at least one genuine break throughout the day to relieve my stress. Even though I feel as if I have nothing together, I am doing the best I can. Before I reflect on this week's topic, I would like to briefly mention the stress relievers that I participated in this week.
My roommates and I made dinner Wednesday night, and we watched a movie with two of our
 |
| Making Dinner! |
friends. On Thursday, my friend and I took a quick lunch trip to Zaxby's. That night, my roommates, my friend, and I played card games and watched another movie. Friday, we rode our bikes to the RAC and played volleyball. I also did a short run to help relieve any more stress. Although I have spent my entire week working, I have also made some wonderful memories with my friends. I will survive the upcoming week.
To reflect on this week's topic, I am going to mention several articles/videos that Dra. provided to our class. Unfortunately, we were unable to have an in-class discussion on this week's topic because we did not attend class.
Most of the articles that Dra. provided centered around the ideas of communication and free speech. Some articles provided tips and insight on participating in debates or in discussions while others outlined recent issues associated with free speech.
In the first article titled "I Take Your Point (1)," the author gives readers insight into the most important action when participating during a discussion. The author states, "...link what you are about to say to something that has already been said." Making a link is very important to ensure that the others in the discussion take your point as being relevant. If you want to mention a point that is not on the same subject, the author suggests that you explicitly indicate that you are changing the topic.
"The Power of Dialogue (2)" is an article that outlines basic ground rules for dialogue while also targeting those who fail to truly communicate. Author Scott London highlights technology's negative influence on people's in-person communication skills. He believes that people have forgotten or simply do not know how to truly listen to another individual. I believe that some people are easily disconnected from others, but I also think that there are people who cannot function without making true connections. One ground rule for effective dialogue that I found important was using concrete examples to raise general issues. Issues are often difficult to discuss when a person does not provide any correlation to the real world. If a person makes sure to give examples, then he or she will be much more successful in a conversation.
The two resources centered around microaggression ("What Exactly is a Microaggression (3)?" and "Microaggressions in the Classroom (4)") had an emotional appeal. I found the video to be more effective when describing the effects of microaggression. Based on the article, I first thought that the people described as victims of microaggression were simply over sensitive, and I thought that the initial microaggression could not be avoided. However, the video brought the scenarios to life. I was able to look at the situation with a different perspective, and I realized how frequent microaggression occurs. One point that surprised me within the article was that people who usually engage in microaggressions are normal, everyday people who good intentions. Before reading and watching the provided article and video, I had no knowledge of the term "microaggression." Now, I can monitor my own actions to uplift others instead of to degrade others.
"Twelve Essential Communication Skills That Aren't Taught in Schools at All (5)" is an article that contains multiple helpful tips for people to become effective communicators. None of the skills listed were unfamiliar to me, meaning I have heard of them before. The one that I agree with the most would definitely be "proactive listening." Those who make it a priority to listen before speaking are people who can often be characterized as trustworthy, patient, and professional. This article not only outlines the effective skills, but it also gives readers advice on how to achieve the skills. I believe that becoming an effective communicator takes practice. Learning the basis of the twelve skills provides readers with a strong mental foundation towards a successful conversation.
 |
| (6) |
Switching to free speech, I would like to recognize the difficulty behind the topic. People have very different opinions and viewpoints with anything and everything. Free speech is an interesting, yet touchy topic for some. I personally wish that I could have experienced an in-class discussion with my peers about free speech. I am interested to hear everyone's viewpoints, and I hope that we will be able to discuss the topic in the future. Although free speech is a difficult topic to discuss because of the controversy it creates, it is a very important topic, as it is vital to resolving conflicts.
The article "Hate Speech is Protected Free Speech: Even at College Campuses (7)" outlines the importance of allowing free speech at college campuses. Author Erwin Chemerinksy states that the primary purpose of a college campus is to provide its students with access to education. He argues that officials of schools should not be able to decide who gets to speak or what gets to be said because people should be allowed to explore different views. On the other hand, the author of the article "On Speech and Belonging (8)" attacks those who exhibit what he believes to be hate speech, a version of free speech. I personally do not like the article because the author seems to go to the extreme to convince his readers that his way is the only way. In the end, who gets to decide what is hateful and what is not? Both articles have strengths and weaknesses. The first provides many real-life examples with evidence to back up the author's claims while the second relies mostly on emotional appeal.
The video titled "Schools are watching students' social media, raising questions about free speech (9)" made me feel very uneasy. Personally, I do not believe that adults/supervisors (other than parents) should monitor children's social media accounts with the intention of looking to punish a child for behavior regarding free speech. I think parents should be mindful of what their children post in order to maintain a safe environment, but I do not think that children should be targeted by other adults. Social media is new, and technology is constantly advancing. My viewpoint is not set in stone, but I currently disapprove of punishing children for their online behavior unless the one punishing the child is his/her parent(s) or unless the child's action presents evident danger.
Lastly, the video titled "Free Speech vs Hate Speech on College Campuses (10)" summarizes the entire dispute discussed in the above articles on free speech. I enjoyed this video because it outlined both viewpoints while also providing facts. The video introduces the question, "Where do you draw the line on hateful speech?" As I previously stated, who gets to decide what is hateful and what is not? In the end, I truly do not know if there is one solution to the problem. Perhaps it is a dispute that will always exist. However, whether we like it or not, people have the right to express their beliefs as long as others are not being put in physical danger.
Thanks for reading!
Resources:
(1) I Take Your Point: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U47Tn-SKpwcQHY_GKHBIcJkViCpijJdt/view?usp=sharing
(2) The Power of Dialogue: http://tiny.cc/effectivedialogue
(3) What Exactly is a Microaggression?: https://www.vox.com/2015/2/16/8031073/what-are-microaggressions
(4) Microaggressions in the Classroom: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ji8Qae9keY
(5) Twelve Essential Communication Skills: http://tiny.cc/effectivecommunication
(6) Image:
https://images.app.goo.gl/AwZBuqGEg81ApVh48
(7) Hate Speech is Protected Free Speech: https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/10/25/16524832/campus-free-speech-first-amendment-protest
(8) On Speech and Belonging: https://blogs.berkeley.edu/2017/09/18/on-speech-and-belonging/
(9) Schools are watching...: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/schools-watching-students-social-media-raising-questions-free-speech
(10) Free Speech vs Hate Speech:
https://www.pbs.org/video/free-speech-vs-hate-speech-on-college-campuses-gkjvrl/